Signatures of genomic instability and DNA repair defects as determinants for tumour clonal dynamics and sensitivity to G-quadruplex stabilizers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutational processes, including DNA repair defects, have been extensively documented across multiple cancer types. Targeting such defects has yielded much promise in the field. Previous studies have shown great therapeutic potential in targeting G-quadruplex (G4) structures in HR (homologous recombination) and NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining)-deficient tumour cells with the G4 stabilizer, CX-5461. In this thesis, we hypothesized that additional genome maintenance pathways and genes may also be relevant in repairing lesions from G4 stabilization. First, we performed an in vitro subgenome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen targeting 480 genome stability-associated genes, in HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells treated with CX-5461, pyridostatin (PDX; a known G4 binder), and BMH-21 (a non-G4 binder). We discovered novel G4-associated genes and pathways including nucleoplasm, DNA secondary structure binding, and ubiquitin signaling. In addition, we identified DNA polymerase theta (POLQ), known to have roles in the microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) pathway which is commonly thought to act as backup repair to HR and NHEJ, as a top depleted gene. G4 stabilizers sensitized POLQ deficient cells in multiple cell lines. Next, we studied in vivo the competitive dynamics of cell populations harbouring different sgRNA-induced DNA repair defects in both cell line- and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Particularly in cell line xenografts, CX-5461 led to the specific lethality of HR (BRCA2) and MMEJ (POLQ) deficient subpopulations, underscoring the importance of both pathways for G4 stabilization in vivo. Finally, we assessed the mutations and changes in DNA repair patterns caused by G4 stabilization. From whole genome sequencing and targeted probe capture sequencing, we observed an increase in mutations in drug-treated cells. Furthermore, using a sequencing based assay to measure different DNA repair pathways, we discovered that in NHEJ-depleted cells, cells preferentially used POLQ-mediated MMEJ, rather than HR, to repair DNA lesions caused by G4 stabilization. Altogether, this study discovered a spectrum of additional genome maintenance-associated vulnerabilities that could be targeted with G4 stabilizer drugs for cancer treatment. In addition, this study identified the novel role of POLQ in repairing DNA damage induced by G4 stabilizers both in vitro and in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".