MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979005092 · doi:10.1002/brb3.1435

Dentate gyrus neurons that are born at the peak of development, but not before or after, die in adulthood

2019· article· en· W2979005092 on OpenAlexafffund
Tina Ciric, Shaina P. Cahill, Jason S. Snyder

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDentate gyrusNeurosciencePsychologyDie (integrated circuit)AudiologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineHippocampusMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: In the dentate gyrus of the rodent hippocampus, neurogenesis begins prenatally and continues to the end of life. Adult-born neurons often die in the first few weeks after mitosis, but those that survive to 1 month persist indefinitely. In contrast, neurons born at the peak of development are initially stable but can die later in adulthood. Physiological and pathological changes in the hippocampus may therefore result from both the addition of new neurons and the loss of older neurons. The extent of neuronal loss remains unclear since no studies have examined whether neurons born at other stages of development also undergo delayed cell death. METHODS: neurons in separate groups of rats at 2 and 6 months post-BrdU injection to estimate cell death in young adulthood. RESULTS: Consistent with previous work, there was a 15% loss of P6-born neurons between 2 and 6 months of age. In contrast, E19- or P21-born neurons were stable throughout young adulthood. DISCUSSION: Delayed death of P6-born neurons suggests these cells may play a unique role in hippocampal plasticity adulthood, for example, by contributing to the turnover of hippocampal memory. Their loss may also play a role in disorders that are characterized by hippocampal atrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207