La production idéologique des rapports sociaux de genre au sein du PCP‑Sendero Luminoso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’inclusion des femmes au sein d’organisations utilisant la violence comme stratégie politique est parfois pensée comme la résultante ou le produit d’une transformation sociale ou, tout au moins, comme l’indice d’un projet politique de transformation des rapports sociaux genrés et genrants. Toutefois, le vécu des femmes qui se joignent à ces organisations est sur ce point très disparate (disparate selon les femmes mais disparate aussi pour la même femme). Ce chapitre rend compte de cette diversité d’expériences en s’attardant sur la production idéologique des rapports sociaux de genre par le parti communiste du Pérou – Sendero Luminoso1 (PCP‑SL) et des pratiques genrées et genrantes au sein de cette organisation. L’analyse montre comment les discours idéologiques et les politiques organisationnelles produisent parallèlement des insurgées affranchies de la domination masculine et des instruments de la lutte armée sous l’emprise d’un patriarcat révolutionnaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".