MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979078628

Good Governance as Prerequisite for Sound Economy

2014· article· pl· W2979078628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie · 2014
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Fiscal Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPolitical scienceEconomyEconomicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Podstawą zdrowej, stabilnie rozwijającej sie gospodarki jest dobre rządzenie (good governanace). W artykule zostaly omowione definicje tego pojecia sformulowane przez ONZ, Bank Światowy i MFW oraz cechy dobrego rządzenia, odnoszące sie do roznych relacji pomiedzy instytucjami panstwowymi a gospodarką i spoleczenstwem. Na podstawie danych raportu BŚ dotyczącego skali korupcji, autor analizuje jakośc instytucji panstwowych w krajach mlodych lub slabych demokracjach. Wskazuje na związek pomiedzy wysokim poziomem korupcji a poziomem rozwoju gospodarczego. W przypadku krajow postsocjalistycznych, a szczegolnie Polski, autor odwoluje sie do ksiązki W. Kiezuna Patologia transformacji. Podkreśla, ze choc wiele jeszcze nalezy usprawnic we wzajemnych relacjach pomiedzy administracją centralną a lokalną, przedsiebiorstwami, instytucjami publicznymi i prywatnymi oraz obywatelami, to są wyraźne sygnaly, ze zmiany nastepują w dobrym kierunku.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it