A novel technology for objective, accurate and non-invasive early diagnosis and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease in clinics and clinical trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We have developed a novel medical image processing technology for objective, accurate, and non-invasive diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease using standard clinical brain MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and basic clinical cognitive assessment. The technology is a robust, highly accurate, fully automated, high-throughput, cloud-based platform, which operates in a fully integrated and controlled environment. In diagnosis mode , our technology performs with 91% balanced accuracy on blind testing to diagnose the current neurocognitive status, and in prognosis mode or early detection at mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage with 88% balanced accuracy on blind testing to predict progression from MCI to Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) within 5 years. Such prognostic capability is currently non-existent, even in specialty clinics and hospitals, a major factor in Alzheimer’s clinical trial failures. The algorithm’s diagnostic certainty precisely mirrors the diagnostic confidence of an expert cognitive neurologist for both MCI (Spearman’s Rho = 1) and AD (Rho = 1). In addition to widespread clinical applications, this novel technology can enable correct patient selection and therapeutic effect monitoring in clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease, the crucial elements to finding a cure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".