MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979209040

From GOLF and SNO to G: The Sun as a Probe of Newton's Constant

2001· article· en· W2979209040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilídio Lopes, Joseph Silk

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelioseismologyPhysicsStandard solar modelRange (aeronautics)Flux (metallurgy)Square (algebra)Constant (computer programming)Computational physicsSpeed of soundNeutrinoSolar neutrinoAstrophysicsAcousticsNuclear physicsMathematicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsGeometryAerospace engineeringEngineeringNeutrino oscillation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A standard model of the Sun calculated using the value for Newton's gravitational constant's G, 6.67259 1E-8 cm^2/g/s^2, that was reported in 1986 (CODATA) predicts that the square of the sound-speed has a relative difference of less than 0.5% from the inverted helioseismic sound speed. However a significant discrepancy persists that is as large as 3% between the predicted sound-speed of the standard solar model and the solar models that are computed with the latest measured values of G, 6.674215 1E-8 cm^2/g^/s^2 and 6.67559 1E-8 cm^2/g/s^2. We conclude that the seismic data seems to prefer a lower value of G. Furthermore, we show that the solar neutrino flux from ^8B decay that has been recently detected at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory could eventually provide the key to the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207