MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979239650 · doi:10.24926/548719.015

Applying nnU-Net to the KiTS19 Grand Challenge

2019· article· en· W2979239650 on OpenAlexaff
John Brandon Graham-Knight, Abtin Djavadifar, Patricia Lasserre, Homayoun Najjaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet (polyhedron)Computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U-Net, conceived in 2015, is making a resurgence in medical semantic segmentation tasks.This comeback is largely thanks to the excellent performance of nnU-Net in recent competitions.nnU-Net generalizes well, as proven by its first-place finish in the Medical Segmentation Decathalon.Notably, nnU-Net focuses on the training process rather than algorithmic improvements, and can often beat more complex algorithms.This paper shows the results of applying nnU-Net to the KiTS19 Kidney Segmentation Grand Challenge.Each of the 5 cross-validation training folds achieves good results, with scores nearing or exceeding 0.9 after approximately 500 epochs per fold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207