Chromophore selective multi-wavelength photoacoustic remote sensing of unstained human tissues
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying positive surgical margins after resection of cancer often triggers re-excision and adjuvant treatments. Incomplete initial resections result in poorer patient outcomes, psychological and financial stress to the patient and increased healthcare costs. Surgical margins are typically assessed post-operatively using time consuming and expensive slide-based histopathology tissue analysis. Currently, a real-time non-contact virtual histology-like intraoperative margin assessment tool is not available. To address this need, we have developed a non-contact multi-wavelength reflection-mode, photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS) microscope demonstrating chromophore selective contrast in human tissues. We show the capabilities of multi-wavelength PARS microscopy utilizing both 266 nm and 532 nm excitation wavelengths and a 1310 nm detection wavelength. Cell nuclei and hemoglobin were visualized at the cellular scale without the addition of exogenous contrast agents. These works provide a critical step towards a virtual histology tool to provide intraoperative histology-like information in living tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it