Higher Resolution sLORETA (HR-sLORETA) in EEG Source Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
sLORETA is one of the well-established EEG source localization methods that is popular for its satisfactory estimation, simplicity, and fast computation. However, the method has a low-resolution and requires manual post-processing thresholding to provide a sparser solution with acceptable resolution in source detection. Here we propose a subspace based thresholding that results in a higher resolution brain imaging based on minimizing a desired least square source detection error. Simulation results show the proposed method, denoted by HR-sLORETA, provides stable and high resolution solution in terms of Percentage of Undetected Sources (PUS) and Spatial Dispersion (SD) compared to the existing manual thresholding approaches as well as Otsu thresholding approach. It is shown that HR-sLORETA outperforms Otsu, which is the only other available automatic thresholding method, in scenarios with three or more sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".