Whole Genome Alignment Based Development of Molecular Marker for Detecting <em>Leptosphaeria maculans</em> and <em>Leptosphaeria biglobosa</em>, the Causal Agent of Blackleg Disease in Brassicas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of the differentially aggressive fungus Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa causing Blackleg in crucifers is crucial. Available markers were designed decades ago which may become ineffective due to the ever evolving nature of the fungus, requiring the development of more precise molecular markers. Methods: The whole genomes of available isolates belonging to this two species were aligned using progressive MAUVE tool, species specific genomic regions were extracted and species specific primers were designed from the sequences that encode for effector proteins. Results: Three (Lm1, Lm2 and Lm5) and two (Lb3 and Lb3’) primer sets specifically detected the isolates of target species in PCR based assay, of which the primers Lm5 and Lb3’ were multiplexed for detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa, generating PCR amplicons of 230 and 834 bp, respectively from a single PCR reaction. The markers were highly sensitive and were able to amplify target species from crude ‘pseudothecia and ascospores suspension’ without requiring DNA extraction. Conclusions: These markers, solitarily or in combination, designed from species specific genomic segments will serve as precise, sensitive and rapid detection of Leptosphaeria maculans and Leptosphaeria biglobosa species and will be helpful for surveillance, management and transboundary quarantine of the devastating disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".