PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND RUSSIAN PRACTICE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors explore the implementation of project management as a result of administrative reforms realization in modern states. This approach is based on the «New Public Management» paradigm. The authors propose an explanatory model of project management in the public sector, presented in the characteristics of providing types of practices (analytical, organizational and management, communication and documentation). The cases of project management in Canada, Great Britain, Norway described in the article led to the conclusion that the successful practices of project approach cause a qualitative transformation of public administration system. The preliminary outcomes of the project management experience in Russian public sector are estimated in the worldwide context. It is proved that human capital becomes the system-forming resource that develops an ecosystem of public management (in spite of its institutional flexibility in modern states and their regions) and provides its efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it