Latest Cretaceous–early Eocene Pacific-Arctic?-Atlantic connection: Co-evolution of strike-slip fault systems, oroclines, and transverse fold-and-thrust belts in the northwestern North American Cordillera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Comprehensive understanding of the pre-Paleogene kinematic evolution of the North American Cordillera in the context of evolving global plate interactions must begin with an understanding of the complex Late Cretaceous–early Eocene structural geometry and evolution of the northwestern Cordillera of Alaska, United States, and Yukon, Canada. Here, I present a kinematic model of the region that shows how regional strike-slip fault systems, including plate-boundary transform faults, interacted with each other, and with north-striking oroclinal folds and fold-and-thrust belts, which formed progressively during coeval shortening between Eurasia and North America. These Late Cretaceous–early Eocene interactions are manifestations of the plate reorganizations in the Pacific and Atlantic-Arctic regions that took place at that time, and that led to rifting and seafloor spreading within the globe-encircling Eurasian–North American plate and to the formation of transform-dominant North American–Pacific (sensu lato) and possibly North American–Arctic plate boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".