Scheduling algorithm based on preemptive priority and hybrid data structure for cognitive radio technology with vehicular <i>ad hoc</i> network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are different types of messages containing different priorities in vehicular ad hoc networks. Hence, queue rescheduling is required according to priorities of arrived messages. In this study, a data structure with less computational complexity is proposed to minimise queuing delay. Further, to maintain quality of service, preemptive priority is applied to time‐bound safety messages by transferring non‐safety messages to other bands using the concept of cognitive radio technology. The time‐bound messages are transmitted using the dedicated short‐range communication spectrum without the need for spectrum sensing by vehicles. The other messages with no deadline constraint are switched to other bands near‐dedicated short‐range communication spectrum. The results show that 6.25% improvement in packet delivery ratio of cognitive radio‐enabled preemptive priority is achieved in comparison to existing cognitive radio protocol. The delay shows a slight increment of 1.1%. The packet delivery ratio of cognitive radio‐enabled non‐preemptive priority is improved by 3.24% while the delay is improved by 3.17%. The data storage required for storing sensing data of 50 channels for 10 days is only 45 Mb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".