MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PTH-138 Colorectal cancer, colectomy and inflammatory bowel disease activity following liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis

2019· article· en· W2979369757 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Thomas, Rachel Cooney, Tariq Iqbal, Subrata Ghosh, James Ferguson, ProfGideon Hirschfield, Palak Trivedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsToronto Liver CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary sclerosing cholangitisMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseColectomyColorectal cancerGastroenterologyInternal medicineLiver transplantationCancerPrimary cancerTransplantationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Primary sclerosing cholangitis[PSC] is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease[IBD] for which liver transplantation[LT] is the only curative therapy.In this study,we provide pooled incidence rates[IR] and time trends of (1)colorectal cancer[CRC], (2)flares in IBD activity and (3)colectomy rates post LT, through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase was undertaken to identify pertinent studies from 1981 to 2014.Included studies were assigned to one or more of the three analytical streams.The ‘meta’ package (R Studio (V.1.1.463)) and Revman was used to pool IRs and HRs from individual studies using a random effects model respectively. Results 42 studies qualified for inclusion in the systematic review.20 studies detailing the clinical course of 1994 patients(cumulative 9874 patient years(PY)) were pooled to assess the occurrence of dysplasia or CRC(combined endpoint) and CRC only; yielding an IR of 14.97 (95%CI9.74–23.02) and 9.21(95%CI6.01–14.09) per 1000 PY,respectively. Heterogeneity was considerable(I2=86%).The incidence of post LT CRC was seen to be decreasing over the past decade(figure 1A).The estimated colectomy rate following OLT was IR 23.18(95%CI16.74–32.08, I2=84%) per 1000 PY. IR for colectomy due to dysplasia/CRC was 11.25 per 1000 PY(95%CI6.43–19.68) and decreasing over time(figure 1B).By contrast, deterioration in IBD activity necessitating colectomy was noted for IR 13.26 per 1000 PY(95% CI 9.95–17.66), with no change in the incidence rate over study duration(figure 1C).9 studies reported on post LT clinical course of IBD according to endoscopy findings or need for escalation in IBD therapy.27.6% of patients (n=584) experienced deterioration in IBD activity after LT.The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid [UDCA] on the risk of CRC after LT was examined by 3 studies.Due to data availability,only 2 studies could be pooled.Use of UDCA increased the risk of CRC post LT in the PSC cohort; HR 2.90 (95%CI 1.37–6.11).Studies examining the impact of UDCA on colectomy and IBD activity post-LT were inconclusive. Conclusion The heightened risk of CRC mandates ongoing colonoscopic surveillance in the PSC/IBD LT population,although the incidence appears to be decreasing.Identification of risk predictors impacting the course of IBD is of critical importance,given that deterioration in activity appears to be the principal indication for colectomy post LT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.018
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207