Clustering Continuous Wavelet Transform Characteristics of Heart Rate Variability through Unsupervised Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis and interpretation of physiological signals acquired non-invasively are increasingly important in Smart Health, precision medicine, and medical research. However, this analysis is hampered due to the length, complexity, and inter-subject variation of these signals, and, consequently, dimensionality reduction and clustering offer substantial benefits. Machine learning, used widely in biomedicine, is increasingly being applied to physiological time series. Among the applications of unsupervised learning, clustering is one of the most important. In this paper, an unsupervised autoen-coder architecture, deep convolutional embedded clustering, is presented as a data-driven approach to study time-frequency characteristics of heart rate variability records. An autoen-coder network is trained on continuous wavelet transforms of heart rate variability signals calculated from publicly-available annotated ECG records with a wide variety of conditions. The latent variables learned by the clustering autoencoder are low-dimensional representations of wavelet transform characteristics that can be visualized and further analyzed. The results indicate that the learned clusters correspond to beat morphologies in the electrocardiogram in many cases, but also that the reduced dimensions of the time-frequency features can potentially provide additional insights into cardiac activity and the autonomic nervous system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".