Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reports the development of a pure deep learning method for segmenting concrete cracks in images. The objectives are to achieve the real-time performance while effectively negating a wide range of various complex backgrounds and crack-like features. To achieve the goals, an original convolutional neural network is proposed. The model consists of standard convolutions, densely connected separable convolution modules, a modified atrous spatial pyramid pooling module, and a decoder module. The semantic damage detection network (SDDNet) is trained on a manually created crack dataset, and the trained network records the mean intersection-over-union of 0.846 on the test set. Each test image is analyzed, and the representative segmentation results are presented. The results show that the SDDNet segments cracks effectively unless the features are too faint. The proposed model is also compared with the most recent models, which show that it returns better evaluation metrics even though its number of parameters is 88 times less than in the compared models. In addition, the model processes in real-time (36 FPS) images at 1025 × 512 pixels, which is 46 times faster than in a recent work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".