Potential kernels for radial Dunkl Laplacians
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We derive two-sided bounds for the Newton and Poisson kernels of the W -invariant Dunkl Laplacian in the geometric complex case when the multiplicity $k(\alpha )=1$ i.e., for flat complex symmetric spaces. For the invariant Dunkl–Poisson kernel $P^{W}(x,y)$ , the estimates are $$ \begin{align*} P^{W}(x,y)\asymp \frac{P^{\mathbf{R}^{d}}(x,y)}{\prod_{\alpha> 0 \ }|x-\sigma_{\alpha} y|^{2k(\alpha)}}, \end{align*} $$ where the $\alpha $ ’s are the positive roots of a root system acting in $\mathbf {R}^{d}$ , the $\sigma _{\alpha }$ ’s are the corresponding symmetries and $P^{\mathbf {R}^{d}}$ is the classical Poisson kernel in ${\mathbf {R}^{d}}$ . Analogous bounds are proven for the Newton kernel when $d\ge 3$ . The same estimates are derived in the rank one direct product case $\mathbb {Z}_{2}^{N}$ and conjectured for general W -invariant Dunkl processes. As an application, we get a two-sided bound for the Poisson and Newton kernels of the classical Dyson Brownian motion and of the Brownian motions in any Weyl chamber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it