MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979412028 · doi:10.1063/1.5119387

Adaptive pre-whiten filtering for the free induction decay transversal signal in weak magnetic detection

2019· article· en· W2979412028 on OpenAlexaff
Huan Liu, Junchi Bin, Haobin Dong, Jian Ge, Zheng Liu, Zhiwen Yuan, Jun Zhu, Haiyang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFoundation of Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory
KeywordsSingular value decompositionNoise (video)Noise reductionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Stochastic resonanceSIGNAL (programming language)Interference (communication)AlgorithmFree induction decayTransversal (combinatorics)PhysicsAdaptive filterSalt-and-pepper noiseFilter (signal processing)MathematicsComputer scienceAcousticsMedian filterStatisticsArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)Spin echoMathematical analysisTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The free induction decay (FID) transversal signal is always employed by a proton precession magnetometer (PPM) to evaluate the time-domain geomagnetic field. Nevertheless, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is an important factor that severely affects the detection accuracy of the magnetic field due to uncontrollable interference sources, including random noise and power frequency noise. In this study, aiming to boost the SNR of the FID transversal signal, a novel filtering algorithm based on a prewhiten (PW) strategy is proposed and the PW filtering was combined with singular value decomposition (SVD) for further noise reduction. This method aims to generate adaptive PW input data before filtering, further decorrelating the noise to reduce the impact of varying noise levels in the received FID signals. The efficiency of the proposed joint filtering framework, dubbed PW-SVD, was evaluated by comparing with two state-of-the-art methods, i.e., SVD and principal component analysis and decomposition, using the same data. The results demonstrated that the proposed PW-SVD method obtained the smallest root mean square error and the highest signal-to-noise ratio improvement among all the compared methods, especially for the strong-noisy scenario, which enhances the environmental adaptability of a PPM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207