MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of Gender in the Clinical Presentation of a First Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in Outpatients.

2006· article· en· W2979413716 on OpenAlexaff
Roseann Andreou, Tulay Koru‐Sengul, Lori‐Ann Linkins, Shannon M. Bates, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Clive Kearon

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeep veinThrombosisVenous thrombosisRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineSurgeryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: As clinical assessment of pretest probability (PTP) is now considered the first step in the diagnostic evaluation of DVT it is important to know if the clinical features of DVT are the same in men and women. OBJECTIVES: We sought to answer the following questions: 1) Is the prevalence of DVT the same in men and women who are referred for diagnostic testing? 2) Are the clinical features of DVT the same in men and women? 3) Does the Wells’ clinical prediction model for first DVT perform similarly in men and women? METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of individual patient data from three studies that evaluated diagnostic testing in outpatients with a suspected first episode of DVT. Associations were assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1838 patients were eligible for final analyses, of whom 1132 (62%) were women and 706 (38%) were men. DVT was objectively diagnosed in 208 patients (11%). QUESTION 1: The prevalence of DVT was higher in men (14%) than in women (9%) (p=0.001). In a multivariable analysis that included eleven other clinical variables male gender was independently associated with a higher prevalence of DVT (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.1). QUESTION 2: Of the confirmed episodes of DVT, “swelling of the entire leg” was observed more often in women (41%) than in men (16%) (p<0.001). This difference was partly explained by more extensive thrombosis in women than in men; the common femoral vein was involved on ultrasound in 48% of women and 22% of men (p< 0.001). The frequency of other clinical features was similar in men and women. QUESTION 3: The prevalence of DVT was higher in men than in women who were categorized by the Wells model as having a low PTP (6.9% vs 3.6%; p=0.025) or a moderate PTP (16.9% vs. 8.7%; p<0.001), but similar in the high PTP category (40% vs 44%; p=0.6). Five clinical features were more strongly associated with presence of DVT in women than in men: “swelling of the entire leg” (OR 7.7 vs. 1.6; p<0.001), “difference in calf circumference >3cm” (OR 8.2 vs. 2.9; p<0.001), “pitting edema” (OR 4.4 vs. 1.8; p=0.004), “age > 60 yrs” (OR 1.8 vs. 0.9; p=0.02) and “bedridden for greater than 3 days” (OR 3.7 vs. 1.4; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among outpatients referred with a suspected first episode of DVT, the prevalence of DVT is higher in men than in women but DVT is more extensive in women. Entire leg swelling is a more common and important sign of DVT in women than in men and the Wells prediction rule behaves differently in men than in women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→