Car4Pac: Last Mile Parcel Delivery Through Intelligent Car Trip Sharing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The explosion of online shopping brings great challenges to traditional logistics industry, where the massive parcels and tight delivery deadline impose a large cost on the delivery process, in particular the last mile parcel delivery. On the other hand, modern cities never lack transportation resources such as the private car trips. Motivated by these observations, we propose a novel and effective last mile parcel delivery mechanism through car trip sharing, to leverage the available private car trips to incidentally deliver parcels during their original trips. To achieve this, the major challenges lie in how to accurately estimate the parcel delivery trip cost and assign proper tasks to suitable car trips to maximize the overall performance. To this end, we develop Car4Pac, an intelligent last mile parcel delivery system to address these challenges. Leveraging the real-world massive car trip trajectories, we first build up a 3D (time-dependent, driver-dependent and vehicle-dependent) landmark graph that accurately predicts the travel time and fuel consumption of each road segment. Our prediction method considers not only traffic conditions of different times, but also driving skills of different people and fuel efficiencies of different vehicles. We then develop a two-stage solution towards the parcel delivery task assignment, which is optimal for one-to-one assignment and yields high-quality results for many-to-one assignment. Our extensive real-world trace driven evaluations further demonstrate the superiority of our Car4Pac solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".