MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979421614 · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8856853

Optimizing Probability Threshold of Convolution Neural Network to Improve HRV-based Acute Stress Detection Performance

2019· article· en· W2979421614 on OpenAlexaff
Jiayuan He, Ning Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkConvolution (computer science)Heart rate variabilityArtificial intelligenceWord error ratePattern recognition (psychology)Rendering (computer graphics)Artificial neural networkStress (linguistics)Speech recognitionHeart rateMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As stress is linked to numerous emotional and physical conditions, its timely detection and proper management is important for our health. Convolution neural network (CNN) has been shown to be promising in stress detection because it could automatically capture the discriminant information regarding physiological change from heart rate variability (HRV), usually derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. This study proposed a two-step training method to improve the acute stress detection performance through optimizing the probability threshold of a CNN. The results showed that the average error rate was significantly reduced from 17.3 ± 9.2% to 9.2 ± 5.7% after probability threshold optimization, and the classification results were more balanced between stress and rest data. This study presented a simple method to improve stress detection performance using CNN without additional data, rendering benefits for the practical application of HRV-based stress measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207