MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979422520 · doi:10.18280/i2m.180306

Design and Software Implementation of a Navigation Accuracy Evaluation Based on Error Model Solution

2019· article· en· W2979422520 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chao Huang, Guoxing Yi, Qingshuang Zeng, Lei Hu, Zeyuan Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareSoftware engineeringReliability engineeringProgramming languageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper attempts to improve the accuracy of navigation accuracy evaluation of inertial navigation system (INS). Firstly, the course effect error of the INS was analyzed in details. Then, the errors of inertial devices like gyro and accelerometer were modelled separately. Based on these models, the author simulated how the course effect error and the second-order errors related to the specific force (SF2Es) affect the speed error, position error and attitude error of the INS, under two trajectory conditions. Based on the solution of the models, a navigation accuracy evaluation software was developed, which can evaluate one or more INSs at the same time. The research findings lay the theoretical basis for INS navigation accuracy evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207