Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article may be deemed as an exploration on the unification of fields as well as a discussion of the completeness in physics. This author tended to support the viewpoint of Einstein and believed that the Uncertainty Principle should be in itself incomplete, and that the representation of the state function ψ should not be complete in quantum mechanics. Following a series of discussions, including the hypothesis of a new quantum, the relativity of electromagnetic field, and the general equivalence principle, this author proposes here a new field equation called Hamilton’s tensor equation (HTE). Acting as the complete presentation of Einstein’s field equation and as an extension of Hamilton’s principle, what this new field equation (HTE) has revealed is that the “virtuality” of space‐time, rather than its curvature, is what determines the distribution and movement of matter and energy. Based on this new field equation (HTE), the author has extended the study to include the unification of fields, a model of new particle, and the phenomenon of black hole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it