MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Darinaparsin a Novel Organic Arsenic Molecule Active in Lymphoma: Development of An Oral Form.

2009· article· en· W2979429646 on OpenAlexaff
Wilson H. Miller, Izidore S. Lossos, Paul Conkling, Carlos Becerra, Martin S. Tallman, Jill Buck, Barbara Wallner, Jonathan J. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosingPharmacologyMedicineMucositisArsenic trioxideToxicityOral administrationApoptosisInternal medicineChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4759 Introduction Darinaparsin is an organic arsenic molecule constructed of dimethylated arsenic linked to glutathione (N-[S-(dimethylarsino)-N-L-gamma-glutamyl-L-cysteinyl]-glycine). It has a multifaceted mechanism of action, inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis mediated through disruption of mitochondrial functions, increased reactive oxygen species production, and modulation of signal transduction pathways. In addition, darinaparsin has anti-angiogenic activity. It has significant activity in a broad spectrum of hematologic and solid tumors in preclinical models, including human cell lines resistant to arsenic trioxide. It is active in heavily treated patients with refractory lymphoma when administered IV 300 mg/m2 for 5 days on a 28 day cycle, and is very well tolerated. Preclinically it is orally highly bioavailable. Oral administration may be of importance in potential utility in lymphoma in continuous metronomic dosing. Methods Two Phase I studies of oral darinaparsin are being conducted in patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory advanced tumors. The first protocol is a Phase I, dose-escalation, oral administration study designed to determine the MTD of darinaparsin capsules. The dosing schedule is a regimen of 2 doses per week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, starting at 300 mg twice weekly. A second Phase I study, having a similar design and objective, evaluates several dosing regimens, including dosing capsules three times per week increasing dosing frequency to daily dosing for 3 weeks, with 1 week of rest. For each study 28 days constitutes one cycle. Standard methods for evaluation of toxicity, escalation and efficacy are being used. Results These two studies have thus far enrolled 19 and 17 patients, respectively. In total there are 24 male and 12 female patients. The median age is 59 years, with a range from 38 to 82 years. To date, MTD has not been reached in either study. The dose continues to be escalated and is currently at 900mg / day twice weekly in the 1st study, and 300 mg daily every day in the 2nd study. Bioavailability has been very high (>75%). All patients were heavily pretreated and refractory. Of 27 evaluable patients thus far in the two trials, 2 had a partial response and 15 had prolonged stable disease, including lymphoma (NHL), head and neck, colon, and pancreatic cancers. The duration of responses has been 3 – 8 + months. Safety and tolerability has been very good and comparable to that of IV darinaparsin. SAEs were atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, each occurring in one patient, and dyspnea, occurring in two patients. No QT prolongation has been observed. Dose escalation continues in both studies and updated results will be presented. Conclusion Darinaparsin is a novel organic arsenic molecule that has demonstrated clinical activity in refractory lymphoma when given IV. When given orally by capsule, the drug is well tolerated and demonstrates early signs of activity. Disclosures: Buck: ZIOPHARM Oncology: Employment. Wallner:ZIOPHARM Oncology: Employment. Lewis:ZIOPHARM Oncology: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207