MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

2822 Twelve-Month Durability of Microbiota-Based Drug RBX2660 for Preventing Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) Is Not Associated With Patient Demographics: Sub-Population Analysis of a Phase 2 Open-Label Study

2019· article· en· W2979430243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arnab Ray, Sarah Mische, Ken Blount, Lindy Bancke, Xin Su, Adam Harvey, Dale N. Gerding

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineClostridioidesDemographicsPopulationDosingDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is an urgent public health threat that is associated with significant mortality and substantial medical cost. Microbiota therapy is gaining acceptance to prevent rCDI in multi-recurrent individuals. Two Phase 2 clinical studies have reported the efficacy of RBX2660, a standardized, stabilized microbiota-based drug, in preventing rCDI. To address the suggestion of demographic differences on treatment outcome, we investigated two key demographic stratifications (age and gender) of rCDI subjects enrolled in the Phase 2 open-label study and their associations with outcomes through 12 months post-RBX2660 treatment. METHODS: Data were drawn from a multi-center, open-label Phase 2 study (NCT02589847) in which subjects with multi-recurrent CDI received <2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema 7 days apart; this analysis includes data to 12 months after completion of dosing, with ongoing follow-up through 24 months. Efficacy was defined as absence of CDI recurrence through 56 days after the last dose; and durability is defined as a continued lack of reported CDI occurrence. Subjects were censored from subsequent time intervals if they experienced a new CDI occurrence. Fisher’s exact test was performed comparing the proportion of treatment subjects who were recurrence-free by subgroup: age, >65 years vs. <65 years; sex, male vs. female. RESULTS: This study included 149 RBX2660-treated participants in the USA and Canada. Eight-week efficacy for RBX2660 in preventing rCDI (76.5%; 114/149) was higher than CDI-free rates in the historical control group (51.8%, 57/110; P < 0.0001). Of the 114 RBX2660 subjects who achieved treatment success through 8-weeks, 109 subjects had 6-month follow-up data. Of those, three experienced a new CDI episode through 6 months. Between 6 and 12 months, two additional subjects experienced a CDI occurrence. The overall durability through 12 months is 91.7%, as four of the 109 subjects didn’t complete 12-month follow-up and were conservatively assessed as failures. Age and gender did not have a statistically significant impact on efficacy outcome (Table 1). The safety profile through 12 months is consistent with previous reports for RBX2660. CONCLUSION: RBX2660, a microbiota-based drug, was efficacious for preventing rCDI, with clinical durability to at least 12-months after treatment. Importantly, durability was not dependent on age or gender. Twenty-four month follow-up of efficacy and safety are ongoing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→