Human von Willebrand Disease Mutations in Mouse von Willebrand Factor Alter Its Cleavage by ADAMTS13.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) is a large multimeric glycoprotein that mediates platelet adhesion to the damaged blood vessel wall and subsequent platelet aggregation at the site of vascular injury. The size of VWF multimers in plasma is regulated by the specific VWF cleaving protease, ADAMTS13, that cleaves VWF at the Y1605-M1606 bond in the VWF A2 domain. The adhesive properties of VWF is directly related to the multimer size, with loss of high molecular weight VWF leading to the bleeding phenotype in Type 2A von Willebrand disease (VWD) and ultra high molecular weight VWF multimers observed in the prothrombotic state of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). VWF mutations leading to multimer changes have not been examined in an animal model. Although the human and mouse VWF genes are highly conserved, mutations in the two genes have not been compared experimentally. To that end, we have made mutations in the mouse VWF (mVWF) cDNA to compare the ADAMTS13 cleavage patterns seen with human VWF mutations in two in vitro assays. Recombinant multimerized full-length mVWF was digested with different concentrations of recombinant mouse ADAMTS13 (mADAMTS13) and 1.5M urea, and analyzed via multimer migration distance. The GST and histidine-tagged G1554-T1668 A2 domain region of mVWF (mVWF115) was assayed via ELISA as follows: the mVWF115 was bound to anti-GST coated plates, digested with mADAMTS13, and intact mVWF115 detected via HRP-labeled anti-histidine tag antibody. We examined R1597W (VWD Type 2A), R1306W, (VWD Type 2B), Y1584C (VWD Type 1), as well as two previously described changes that drastically lower VWF cleavage, Y1605A/M1606A, and D1614A/E1615A/K1617A. Y1584C showed a statistically insignificant 41% decrease in cleavage in the full-length assay, but a 20% increase in the mVWF115 assay. Conversely, R1597W had a 64% decrease in the full-length assay, but a 28% increase in the mVWF115 assay. Y1605A/M1606A showed a dramatic loss of cleavage, with no observable loss of high molecular weight multimers at 32 units/ml of mADAMTS13, and a 126-fold higher mADAMTS13 concentration than wild type in the mVWF115 assay. This contrasted with the 8-fold increase observed with D1614A/E1615A/K1617A. The R1306W A1 domain mutation showed a significant increase in cleavage, with 63% less ADAMTS13 necessary in the full-length assay. The triple mutant R1306W/Y1605A/M1606A did not cleave at the highest concentration, 32 U/ml, similar to that of Y1605A/M1606A, showing that the R1306W mutation was not able to increase cleavage of the Y1605A/M1606A change. These results show a strong correlation between the mouse mutations described here and previously reported human VWF mutations in their susceptibility to ADAMTS13 cleavage. These results provide a rationale for the development of mouse models of type 1, 2A, and 2B VWD, as well as mVWF mutations that might lead to a prothrombotic state similar to TTP in humans. mADAMTS13 Concentration for 50% mVWF Cleavage ADAMTS13 Concentration (Units/ml) Relative mADAMTS13 Concentration (to Wild Type) mVWF Multimer (n=1) mVWF115 (n=4) mVWF Multimer (n=1) mVWF115 (n=4) *: P value <0.05, **: P Value < 0.001 in 2 tailed T test. Wild Type 0.301 0.197 1 1 Y1584C 0.423 0.157* 1.41 0.80* R1597W 0.109** 0.253* 0.36** 1.28* Y1605A/M1606A >32** 24.8** >100** 126** D1614A/E1615A/K1617A (−) 1.58** (−) 8.0** R1306W 0.112** (−) 0.37** (−) R1306W/Y1605A/M1606A >32** (−) >100** (−)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".