MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Therapeutic Targeting of CD163 on Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells By Novel Monoclonal Antibody TBI 304H Demonstrates an Increase in Erythropoiesis in Humanized Mice

2015· article· en· W2979468281 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn E. Matthews, Irina Eberle-Ayres, Katherine Lu, Nishi N. Singh, Murray J. Cutler, David Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsTherapure Biopharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisErythropoiesisSevere combined immunodeficiencyProgenitor cellCD34Stem cellBone marrowImmunologyCD163Monoclonal antibodyBiologyCancer researchAntibodyMedicineIn vivoMacrophageInternal medicineAnemiaCell biologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hemoglobin (Hb) is known to stimulate erythropoiesis, a process that may be mediated by CD163. CD163 is a receptor for the hemoglobin-haptoglobin (Hb-Hp) complex expressed on monocyte/macrophages as well as a subpopulation of human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). We have demonstrated that administration of ligands to the CD163 receptor can measurably stimulate erythropoiesis in human CD34+ cell-engrafted severe-combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. To better elucidate the role of CD163 in hematopoiesis, we investigated the effects of the natural ligand to CD163 (Hb-Hp) as well as a stimulatory antibody, TBI 304H, on HPCs in vivo. SCID mice engrafted with human CD34+ cells were used as a model system were used to investigate the effect of Hb and anti-CD163 monoclonal antibodies (TBI 304 and TBI 304H) on human hematopoiesis in vivo. In an initial study, NOD-SCID IL2R gammanull (NSG) mice were engrafted with human CD34+ cells and animals with < 30% human CD45+ cells in the peripheral blood were administered 2 mg Hb/mouse, or 100 or 500 µg/mouse TBI 304 every 4 days for a total of four doses. At study termination on day 14, bone marrow cells (BMCs) were examined by flow cytometry and CD34+ cells were recovered from the BMCs for enumeration in colony-forming assays. Hemoglobin administration resulted in an increase of human CD34+ cells ranging from 4% to 7% of BMCs and a corresponding 57% increase in colony-forming cells (CFCs) over control animals. In contrast, the monoclonal antibody (mAb), TBI 304, produced a dose-dependent decrease in CD34+ and colonies, possibly reflecting a depletion of CD34+/CD163+ cells as a result of overstimulation due to the much longer circulating half-life of the mAb compared to Hb.. To confirm this hypothesis, human CD34+ cell engrafted animals were given only a single dose of 10 or 100 µg/mouse of TBI 304 and BMCs were examined earlier on day 7. TBI 304 provided a 3.5-fold increase in human CD34+ cells as well as a 1.8 to 6.7-fold increase in bone marrow erythroid lineage engraftment (huGlyA+, huCD36+ and huCD71+) and a 2-fold increase in colony-forming cells. The ability of TBI 304 to stimulate erythropoiesis in preclinical models led to the creation of an anti-CD163 mAb suitable for human clinical use. TBI 304H was generated by grafting the complementarity-determining regions derived from TBI 304 onto a humanized IgG4 framework without altering antigen specificity. An IgG4 framework, as an antibody without Fc effector function, was deemed the most suitable for an agonistic mAb. In the single dose, 7 day Hu-SCID model human CD34+ cells were mobilized from the mouse bone marrow by TBI 304H, as reflected by dose dependent decreases in huCD34+, huCD71+, and huGlyA+ cells in the mouse marrow. At the highest dose tested (500 µg/mouse) the decrease in human HPCs was similar to that found in animals administered Hb (2 mg/mouse). In this model, human hematopoiesis derived from the engrafted human CD34+ cells is not sustained and these date may reflect a mobilization of human HPCs through stimulation by an anti-CD163 antibody. Therapure has received U.S. FDA approval to conduct a Phase I trial of the novel therapeutic antibody TBI 304H. The Phase I clinical trial is a single-center, open-label, intra-subject escalating dose study, which will evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of TBI 304H following administration to subjects experiencing chemotherapy-induced anemia. Disclosures Matthews: Therapure Biopharma: Employment. Eberle-Ayres:Therapure Biopharma: Employment. Lu:Therapure Biopharma: Employment. Singh:Therapure Biopharma: Employment. Cutler:Therapure Biopharma: Employment. Bell:Therapure Biopharma: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207