MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979506821 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.151.151

A Potential New Application of Mobilization/Leukapheresis for Enrichment of Peripheral Blood in Circulating Non-Hematopoietic CXCR4+CD45− Tissue-Committed Stem Cells (TCSC) for Organ/Tissue Regeneration.

2004· article· en· W2979506821 on OpenAlexaff
Magda Kucia, Ryan Reca, Marcin Wysoczynski, Jolanta Goździk, Janina Ratajczak, Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukapheresisHaematopoiesisStem cellCXCR4BiologyTransplantationCell biologyBone marrowRegeneration (biology)ImmunologyNeurosphereMedicineCD34Internal medicineIn vitroAdult stem cellEndothelial stem cellInflammationChemokine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During mobilization hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) egress from the bone marrow (BM) into peripheral blood (PB) where they temporarily circulate and can be collected by leukapheresis. However, recently we demonstrated that BM, in addition to HSC, contains heterogeneous populations of CXCR4+ tissue-committed stem cells (TCSC) and we contend that the contribution of these cells to organ/tissue regeneration after transplantation of BM cells has been misinterpreted as evidence for “plasticity” or “trans-dedifferentiation” of HSC (Leukemia2004:18;29–40). To determine whether TCSC could also be mobilized into PB we i) evaluated the presence of these cells in the PB of G-CSF-mobilized patients (n=11), ii) attempted to increase mobilization of the TCSC in a murine model by combining G-CSF with T140 (a CXCR4 antagonist) or SB290157 (the C3a complement fragment receptor antagonist which we have found to desensitize the responsiveness of HSC to SDF-1), and iii) tested the hypothesis that TCSC could also be mobilized into PB during stress related to tissue/organ injury, e.g., heart infarct, stroke, partial body irradiation. The presence of mobilized/circulating TCSC in PB was evaluated by i) real-time RT-PCR, ii) immunohistochemical staining for TCSC markers and iii) demonstrating the potential of mobilized TCSC to grow neurospheres or to form myotubes in vitro. We present evidence for the first time that i) G-CSF efficiently enhances the release into PB not only of HSC but also of TCSC expressing markers for early skeletal muscle, myocardium, neural tissue, pancreas and liver, ii) a combination of G-CSF with T140 or SB290157 is 25–30 times more effective in selectively mobilizing TCSC compared to G-CSF alone, and iii) TCSC are also mobilized to PB during stress related to heart infarct, stroke or partial body irradiation. Furthermore, we observed that TCSC, like HSC, express CXCR4 and Sca-1 but do not radioprotect lethally irradiated mice and, unlike HSC, are CD45-negative. Based on these findings we postulate that mobilization/leukapheresis procedures may find a new application for obtaining TCSC for use in tissue/organ regeneration. We are currently testing this hypothesis in murine models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207