MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979539308 · doi:10.3749/canmin.ab00008

The core margin zone of the Emmons pegmatite: the directional aspects of ball muscovite

2019· article· en· W2979539308 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alexander U. Falster, William B. Simmons, Karen L. Webber

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationGeologyMuscoviteIconArtArt historyArchaeologyHistoryLibrary sciencePaleontologyComputer scienceQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 30, 2019 The core margin zone of the Emmons pegmatite: the directional aspects of ball muscovite Alexander U. Falster; Alexander U. Falster § MP 2Research Laboratory, Maine Mineral & Gem Museum, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine 04217, USA § Corresponding author e-mail address: alexander.falster@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar William B. Simmons; William B. Simmons MP 2Research Laboratory, Maine Mineral & Gem Museum, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine 04217, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Karen L. Webber Karen L. Webber MP 2Research Laboratory, Maine Mineral & Gem Museum, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine 04217, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) 57 (5): 735–736. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00008 Article history first online: 07 Oct 2019 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Alexander U. Falster, William B. Simmons, Karen L. Webber; The core margin zone of the Emmons pegmatite: the directional aspects of ball muscovite. The Canadian Mineralogist 2019;; 57 (5): 735–736. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00008 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search The Emmons pegmatite (Falster et al. 2006) on Uncle Tom Mountain (Fig. 1) is one of the most evolved pegmatites in the Oxford pegmatite field in western Maine. Compared to other pegmatites in the field, it is relatively well-zone (Fig. 2). The wall zone in the hanging wall displays schorl in comb texture, indicating undercooling. The intermediate zone is extensive and in the foot wall shows two garnet-tourmaline bands. The core zone is rimmed by ball muscovite which is a striking feature and delineates the boundary with the core zone. The convex surface... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207