MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979545099 · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8856399

Estimation of the Blood Pressure Waveform using Electrocardiography

2019· article· en· W2979545099 on OpenAlexaff
Cederick Landry, Sean D. Peterson, Arash Arami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelWaveformAutoregressive modelComputer scienceBlood pressureElectrocardiographyArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Nonlinear systemPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a modelling approach to accurately predict the blood pressure (BP) waveform time series from a single input signal. A nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous input (NARX) is implemented using artificial neural networks and trained on Electrocardiography (ECG) signals to predict the BP waveform. The efficacy of the model is demonstrated using the MIMIC II database. The proposed method can accurately estimate systolic and diastolic BP. The NARX model together with ECG measurement allows continuous monitoring of BP, enables the estimation of other physiological measurements, such as the cardiac output, and provides more insight on the patient health condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207