MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Incidence and Prognostic Significance of 9p21 Abnormalities In Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients – the IWK Experience

2010· article· en· W2979592087 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brett Gardiner, Barbara Morash, Christie Riddell, Hao Wang, Conrad V. Fernandez, Margaret Yhap, Jason N. Berman

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsCancer Care Nova ScotiaIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCDKN2AMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationCDKN2BFluorescence in situ hybridizationMedicineOncologyChildhood leukemiaLeukemiaInternal medicinePathologyBiologyLymphoblastic LeukemiaChromosomeCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1705 Background: Outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood malignancy, have improved significantly due to risk-based multi-agent chemotherapy strategies derived from diagnostic advances in cytogenetics and molecular biology. Characterization of recurrent genetic lesions has enabled further prognostic stratification on recent clinical trials. Abnormalities involving the short arm of chromosome 9 are well-documented in pediatric ALL. Three critical tumor suppressors: CDKN2a (p16INK4a), CDKN2b (p15INK4b) and p14ARF have been localized to band 9p21. While 9p21 abnormalities have been reported in 10% of childhood ALL, their prognostic significance remains uncertain and may depend on which of these genes are lost/inactivated. Moreover, 9p deletions may be cryptic and/or not readily identified by standard G-banding techniques. We investigated the incidence and prognostic significance of 9p21 abnormalities identified retrospectively in pediatric ALL patients. Methods: A total of 76 children were diagnosed with ALL at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia from 2000–2005. Cell pellets were available for analysis on 48 patients. Chart review was conducted retrospectively. Approval was obtained by the IWK Research Ethics Board. 9p21 abnormalities were assessed by two modalities: 1) fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using a commercial p16 probe; and 2) methylation specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA), using SALSA MLPA kit ME024-A1 9p21 CDKN2A/2B region (MRC Holland). Results: Of the 48 samples studied by FISH, 18 (38%) had a 9p21 deletion, only 4 of which were previously identified by G-banding. MLPA was performed on 40 samples and identified a total of 18 (45%) patients with a 9p21 deletion, 5 of which were not identified by FISH. Aberrant methylation at CDKN2b (p15INK4b) was found by MLPA in 19 patients (46%). Overall, 32 of 48 (67%) patients were determined to have an abnormal 9p21, representing a substantially greater frequency than previously reported. The detection rate for deletions at 9p21 between FISH and MLPA, was not statistically different (p=0.31). Interestingly, all patients with T-cell disease (n=5) had an abnormal 9p21, suggesting an association between this immunophenotype and 9p21 abnormalities (p=0.02). Overall, 9p21 abnormalities were associated with National Cancer Institute (NCI) high risk criteria (p=0.04), specifically white blood cell count >50,000/μL at diagnosis (p=0.019) and a higher percentage of leukemic blasts in the peripheral blood (p=0.016). Only four B-cell lineage patients in our cohort relapsed, three of which had 9p21 abnormalities and one of these ultimately died of disease. Conclusions: Using FISH and MLPA, our study has revealed a much higher incidence of 9p21 abnormalities in childhood ALL than has previously been described. Moreover, our findings demonstrate an association with high risk features and possibly inferior prognosis. It is possible that the lack of consistent reports linking 9p21 abnormalities to prognosis are related to suboptimal ascertainment. A small sample size in our study prevents the conclusive determination of an independent prognostic impact. However, our results justify the need for a larger multi-center investigation to evaluate how 9p21 abnormalities might affect ALL outcome and possibly influence future risk stratification for determining treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207