MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979592239 · doi:10.14740/jnr.v9i4-5.544

Characteristic Analysis and Literature Review of Hereditary Spinocerebellar Ataxia With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis and Valvular Prolapse

2019· article· en· W2979592239 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yi Bao, Wanjuan Tang, Siqin Zhou, Ying Wang, Xiao Jing, Lei Gao, Ran An, Guangjian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpinocerebellar ataxiaSpondylolisthesisLumbarAtaxiaPathologyDiseaseAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is an autosomal dominant disease with high genetic heterogeneity, which cannot be cured until now. According to clinical manifestations or genetic pathology classification, SCA types 1 to 47 have been characterized so far, and the pathogenic genes of 28 SCA types have been identified. The clinical manifestations of the disease are diverse and easy to be misdiagnosed. This study aims to describe the family characteristics, specific clinical manifestations and genotyping of SCA patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to check the atrophy of the brain and spinal cord. The lumbar spondylolisthesis was examined by computed tomography (CT). The possible influencing factors were analyzed by questioning each member of the patient’s family, especially the persons with the disease, to draw the genetic genealogy. Relevant literatures were searched to compare differences in genotypes between the patient and similar clinical manifestations. Craniocerebral MRI showed that cerebellar sulcus widened and deepened, vermis atrophy; enlargement of the cistern around the brainstem; cerebral cortex atrophy, furrow, fissure widen. Lumbar CT showed L3 spondylolisthesis slightly to the right. Genetic genealogy showed that the children of the patients still had the disease, and the children of the patients without the disease were all normal, which is consistent with the autosomal dominant genetic law. Compared with the literature, the patient had the same clinical manifestations as Machado’s disease: convex eyes, dysarthria, terminal muscles atrophy, ataxia gait, weakened tendon reflex, and arched foot. The same clinical manifestations of SCA40 included ataxia, wide-based gait, poor range discrimination and rotation movement disorder, but there were also many discrepancies. The patient’s lumbar spondylolisthesis and valvular prolapse were not present in any of the previous types. In conclusion, craniocerebral MRI and gene sequencing can help distinguish and diagnosis the subtypes of SCA; whether this patient is a new subtype with lumbar spondylolisthesis and heart valve prolapse needs further study; this genealogy supports that through eugenics dominant genetic diseases being passed on to the offspring can be avoided. J Neurol Res. 2019;9(4-5):81-88 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr544

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207