MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979596880

Primerjava Centra za varovanje in zaščito slovenske policije s primerljivimi izbranimi enotami po svetu : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo

2017· dissertation· sl· W2979596880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Urankar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagesl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary History and Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

V uvodnem delu diplomskega dela je predstavljeno zakaj je varovanje državnih voditeljev in ostalih državnikov pomembno, kaksna je zgodovina nastanka enot za osebno varovanje in kaj bo sam cilj diplomskega dela. Glavna naloga je bila se osredotociti in diplomo izdelati v okviru postavljenih hipotez. V nadaljevanju so predstavljeni nekateri pojmi s podrocja varovanja. Nato so glede na javno dostopne podatke predstavljene službe za varovanje nekaterih pomembnih oseb in objektov izbranih držav. To so Center za varovanje in zascito slovenske policije,kanadska Royal canadian mounted police, indijske Special protection group, President's bodyguards, National security guard in oddelek delhiske policije, izraelski Shin Bet, nigerijska State security service, novozelandski Diplomatic protection service, filipinski Presidential security group, poljski Buiro ochrony rzadu, romunski Serviciul de protectie si paza, južnokorejski Presidential security service, svedski Sakerhetspolisen, vatikanska Svicarska garda ter United states secret service in Diplomatic security service Združenih držav Amerike. Službe so pod državo v kateri delujejo opisane tako, da je najprej opisana njihova zgodovina nastanka, nato pa se je ugotavljalo pod kaksno maticno telo spadajo, koliko služb ali enot za varovanje pomembni oseb v državi sploh je in katere funkcionarje varujejo. Po tem so službe za varovanje iz vseh izbranih tujih držav posamicno primerjane s Centrom za varovanje in zascito slovenske policije. Zakljucek diplomske naloge vsebuje potrditve oziroma zavrnitve na zacetku postavljenih hipotez. Ugotovljeno je, da službe za varovanje nekaterih pomembnih oseb in objektov razlicnih držav, z manjsimi odstopanji varujejo primerljive funkcionarje. Prav tako je lahko razbrano, da nimajo vse izbrane države le po eno taksno službo in, da niso razvrscene pod primerljiva maticna telesa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0170.004
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilitary History and StrategyFrench-language works237,207