« Nella casa di Saties » Il Pittore di Bonn 83 e l’attività dell’officina campanizzante a Vulci nel iv secolo a.C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe reassessment of an Etruscan red-figure stamnos at the Royal Ontario Museum of Toronto leads to its attribution to the Painter of Bonn 83, a relevant figure of the ‘Campanizing Group’ described by John D. Beazley. This attribution is the first step of the analysis in depth of the signature-motifs appearing in the 19 vases attributed to this painter and of their development in the course of the artist’s life. The Toronto stamnos belongs to the youth of the painter and is the only vase marked with an inscription, which records the place of production as belonging to the Saties family. This is attested exclusively in Vulci and known to be the owner of the prestigeous Tomb Francois, contemporary to the Painter of Bonn 83. It is therefore likely that the painters of the ‘Campanizing Group’ worked in Vulci under the protection of one of the most important gentes of the local elite, which owned the relevant workshop and was probably involved in the reception of immigrant craftsmen from Magna Grecia. italianoLa revisione di uno stamnos etrusco a figure rosse del Royal Ontario Museum di Toronto consente di attribuire il vaso al Pittore di Bonn 83, figura di spicco del cosiddetto ‘Campanizing Group’ di John D. Beazley: tale attribuzione consente di approfondire l’analisi dei motivi firma di questo pittore, al quale sono assegnati 19 vasi, e il loro sviluppo nel corso dell’attivita dell’artista. Lo stamnos di Toronto, ancora inquadrato nella fase giovanile, e l’unico tra i vasi ad essere contrassegnato da un’iscrizione, che registra il luogo di produzione come appartenente alla famiglia Saties, attestata esclusivamente a Vulci e nota per essere titolare della prestigiosa Tomba Francois, contemporanea all’attivita del Pittore di Bonn 83. Si puo pertanto concludere con buona verosimiglianza che i pittori del ‘Gruppo Campanizzante’ abbiano operato a Vulci sotto l’egida di una delle gentes piu in vista dell’elite locale, che aveva la titolarita dell’officina e probabilmente non era estranea all’accoglienza di artigiani immigrati dalla Magna Grecia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".