MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979610811 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.894.894

Phase I Study Demonstrates Activity and Tolerability of Diphtheria Toxin Interleukin-3 Fusion Protein in Patients with AML and MDS.

2007· article· en· W2979610811 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur E. Frankel, EC Smith, Tom George, J.S. Liu, Jonghun Lee, Seol-Gi Park, David A. Rizzieri, Donna E. Hogge

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiphtheria toxinInternal medicineTolerabilityMyeloid leukemiaGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchOncologyImmunologyToxicityAdverse effectBiologyToxin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R) proteins are over-expressed on blasts and cancer stem cells of multiple hematologic malignancies. The recombinant diphtheria toxin fusion protein, DT388IL3, specifically targets IL-3R and is composed of the catalytic and translocation domains of diphtheria toxin (DT388) fused to human interleukin-3 (IL3). DT388IL3 demonstrated selective toxicity to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stem cells both in vitro and in vivo, and was prepared for a Phase I clinical study in AML and myelodysplasia (MDS) patients. FDA approval (BB IND#11314) and IRB approvals were obtained. 80 AML and MDS patients were screened and 38 AML and 3 MDS patients were treated. The median age of treated patients was 62 years (range, 25–81 years). There were 22 males and 19 females. AML disease was de novo in 5, 1st relapse in 12, 2nd relapse in 8, and refractory in 12. MDS disease was high-grade in one and intermediate-grade in 2. Five AML patients had a history of MDS, and one had a history of secondary AML. One patient each had previously received an autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant. AML cytogenetics was unfavorable in 15, intermediate in 21, and not done in 2. Seven patients were treated with 4 ug/kg, eight patients with 5.3 ug/kg, thirteen patients with 7.1 ug/kg, seven with 9.4 ug/kg, and six with 12.5 ug/kg DT388IL3 for up to six treatments (one cycle). Of note, patients have not yet received a second cycle. Drug-related toxicities were mild to moderate and transient including fever, chills, hypotension, transaminasemia, hypoxemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Pretreatment anti-DT antibody levels ranged from 0 – 9.6ug/mL (mean = 2.3ug/mL); day 15 post-treatment antibody levels were 0 – 600ug/mL (mean = 92ug/mL); day 30 antibody levels were 1.1 – 306ug/mL (mean = 82ug/mL). Day 1 Cmax ranged from 0 – 350 ng/mL and correlated with dose; Day 12 Cmax ranged from 0 – 179 ng/mL and correlated with Day 12 anti-DT antibody levels. Development of anti-DT antibody levels at Day 15 and 30 did not interfere with response. Consistent with an absence of toxicity to normal hematopoietic progenitors, responses occurred in the absence of prolonged myelosuppression. Among 38 evaluable AML patients, we have observed one CR of 8 months duration, 2 partial remissions (PRs) lasting one and three months, and 3 minimal responses with clearance of peripheral blasts and marrow blast cytoreductions of 89%, 90%, and 90% lasting one to two months. In one evaluable MDS patient, we achieved a PR lasting four months with improvement in hematologic parameters and conversion to transfusion independence. Patient accrual is proceeding with correlative IL3R content of blasts and cancer stem cells. These results of activity and tolerability are encouraging and suggest that DT388IL3 may achieve a role in the management of patients with myeloid malignancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsFrench-language works237,207