MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979684921 · doi:10.1177/1081286519877676

Uniform stress state inside a non-elliptical inhomogeneity near an irregularly shaped hole in antiplane shear

2019· article· en· W2979684921 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAntiplane shearConformal mapSingularityShear (geology)Shear stressBoundary value problemGeometryTraction (geology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Stress (linguistics)Materials scienceBoundary (topology)MechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsGeologyStress intensity factorComposite materialFracture mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytic continuation and conformal mapping techniques are applied to establish that the state of stress inside a non-elliptical elastic inhomogeneity can remain uniform despite the presence of a nearby irregularly shaped hole when the surrounding matrix is subjected to uniform remote antiplane shear stresses. The hole boundary is assumed to be either traction-free or subjected to antiplane line forces. Detailed numerical results are presented to demonstrate the resulting analytical solutions. Our results indicate that in maintaining a uniform stress distribution inside the inhomogeneity, it is permissible for the stresses in the matrix to exhibit either a square root singularity at sharp corners of a hole boundary or a high level of stress concentration at rounded corners of a hole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207