MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979717776 · doi:10.9771/ell.v0i63.33762

BRINCADEIRAS INFANTIS NO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO: UM ESTUDO DIATÓPICO E LÉXICO-SEMÂNTICO DE DENOMINAÇÕES PARA A “COBRA-CEGA” | CHILDREN S AMUSEMENT IN THE STATE OF SÃO PAULO: A DIATOPIC AND LEXICIAN-SEMANTIC STUDY OF DENOMINATIONS FOR COBRA-CEGA

2019· article· pt· W2979717776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos Linguísticos e Literários · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="section"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Resumo: </span><span>Este estudo analisa as denominações obtidas para a brincadeira em que uma criança, com os olhos vendados, tenta pegar as outras (COMITÊ NACIONAL DO PROJETO ALiB, 2001, p. 34), área semântica Jogos e Diversões Infantis. O universo da pesquisa compreendeu 188 inquéritos do Projeto ALiB realizados nas 37 localidades paulistas e 10 na área de controle, estas limítrofes à divisa estadual, com informantes selecionados segundo a metodologia do projeto ALiB. Para tanto, utilizaram-se os pressupostos da Dialetologia, da Lexicologia, da Semântica e da Etnolinguística, o que permitiu apurar que a variante cobra-cega foi a mais produtiva neste estudo, seguido por cabra-cega e que suas ocorrências se relacionam às características dos informantes e à história social das localidades em que foram documentadas.</span></p><div class="page" title="Page 2"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Abstract: </span><span>This study analyzes the denominations learned from a play in which a child is blindfolded and </span><span>tries to catch the others (COMITÊ NACIONAL..., 2001, p. 34), Semantic area Games and Children's </span><span>Amusement. The research universe is composed of 188 surveys from the ALiB Project conducted in 37 places of São Paulo and 10 of the control area, bordering the state border, with selected informants according to an ALIB methodology. In order to do so, the assumptions of Dialectic, Lexicology, Semantics and Ethnolinguistics were used, which helped to estabilish </span><span>the “cobra</span><span>-</span><span>cega” variant more productive in this study, followed for “cobra</span><span>-</span><span>cega” and that its occurrences are related to the characteristics of the </span><span>informants and the social history of the places where they were documented. </span></p><p><span>Keywords</span><span>: Diaclectology; ALiB Project; Games </span><span>and children’s amusement</span><span>; Cobra-cega; São Paulo. </span></p></div></div></div><p><span><br /></span></p></div></div></div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it