Impacts of Currents and Waves on Bottom Drag Coefficient in the East China Shelf Seas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High‐frequency measurements of waves, currents, and turbulence were made using the bottom‐mounted tripod equipped with the Nortek 6‐MHz acoustic Doppler velocimetry at eight mooring stations in the East China Shelf Seas. The observational data are analyzed to estimate the bottom drag coefficient and also the contributions from currents and waves. Variations of bottom drag coefficient caused by currents show no obvious relationship with water depth. Generally, the current‐induced drag coefficient decreases with the strengthening currents, and the wave‐induced drag coefficient increases with the enhancing waves. Synthesis analyses of the observational data reveal a scale relationship between the current‐induced drag coefficient and the turbulent Reynolds number and that between the wave‐induced drag coefficient and the bottom wave orbital velocity. The analyses show no significant impacts of waves on turbulent Reynolds stress, and the total bottom drag coefficient is the sum of that due to currents and waves. The empirical formula for bottom drag coefficient derived from this study may help to improve the simulation of tides, storm surges, and sediment transport in coastal seas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".