MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979766764 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861721

Robotic Manipulator Control Using PD-type Fuzzy Iterative Learning Control

2019· article· en· W2979766764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Iterative learning controlController (irrigation)Convergence (economics)Fuzzy logicRobotFuzzy control systemRobotic armNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a single arm planar manipulator robot with a moving platform is controlled based on PD-type Fuzzy Iterative Learning Control (ILC). The manipulator robot is modeled based on the Euler Lagrange equation, and the Multi-Input-Multi-Output (MIMO) nonlinear model is obtained for simulation. The DC motor torque and horizontal force for moving platform are system inputs, and position of the moving platform and robot arm are system outputs. The linearized state-space linear model of the robot is obtained for analyzing stability and convergence of proposed controller. The results of comparing the proposed PD-type fuzzy ILC controller to P-type, PD-type, and P-type Fuzzy ILC illustrate fast and accurate reference tracking the performance of this proposed controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207