MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The patrimonial tomb of the Gotovtsevs in the village of Likurga: preliminary results of the study

2019· article· en· W2979772237 on OpenAlex
Aleksandr G. Avdeyev

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik of Kostroma State University · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitaphQuarter (Canadian coin)White (mutation)Ancient historyHistoryEgyptologyArchaeologyGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper, written in the framework of the CIR project (Corpus of Russian inscriptions / Corpus Inscriptionum Rossicorum), summarises the preliminary results of the study of the complex of white stone tombstones from the unique historical, cultural and architectural monument of the late 17th century – the ancestral tomb of the Gotovtsevs, Galich noble family in the village of Likurga of Buy district of Kostroma Region. It has preserved 11 white stone tombstones with epitaphs, the earliest of which dates the late 16th to the early 17th century, while the latest, 1725. The inscriptions on the tombstones contain important material on the genealogy of Galich branch of the noble family of the Gotovtsevs, up to its suppression in the fi rst quarter of the 18th century. The Annex to the paper publishes the oldest tombstone with the epitaph to Davyd Urakov, son of Gotovets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it