MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979773399 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861961

Peripherally Excited Phased Arrays: Beam Steering with Reduced Number of Antenna Elements

2019· article· en· W2979773399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeam steeringPhased arrayPhased-array opticsExcited stateAntenna (radio)Beam (structure)Reconfigurable antennaPhysicsDirectional antennaComputer scienceMicrostrip antennaElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringOpticsCoaxial antennaEngineeringAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new concept is proposed for reducing the number of active antenna elements in a scannable phased array. The proposed approach is based on the recent concept of the Huygens’ metasurface. In such a metasurface, the fields in a given region are controlled by electromagnetic sources on the boundary surface of this region. Using this approach, a peripherally excited (PEX) metallic cavity is engineered to radiate a beam by appropriately perforating its top surface. This pencil beam can be scanned by simply changing the phases of the peripheral sources. The proposed concept has the potential to drastically reduce the required active elements in 2D phased arrays without compromising directivity. However, this also leads to constraints on the possible beam-pointing directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207