MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979785021 · doi:10.7202/1063703ar

Quelle mesure pour la culture nationale ? Hofstede vs Schwartz vs Globe

2019· article· fr· W2979785021 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emna Moalla

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHofstede's cultural dimensions theoryGlobeHumanitiesCultural valuesSociologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La culture nationale « ou distance culturelle » a fait l’objet de plusieurs recherches dans le champ du management international (MI). Afin de mesurer la distance culturelle, ces recherches ont largement mobilisé le cadre culturel de Hofstede. Cet article évalue et compare les différents cadres culturels les plus importants en MI. S’appuyant sur un échantillon d’opérations de rapprochement menées par des entreprises françaises à l’étranger, l’étude révèle des résultats différents selon le cadre culturel mobilisé. Si les cadres culturels de Schwartz et de Globe, tout comme le cadre révisé de Hofstede, semblent influencer le choix du mode d’entrée, aucune incidence ne résulte du cadre culturel initial de Hofstede.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesFrench-language works237,207