Produção colaborativa de textos multimodais a partir do gênero infográfico digital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Opresente artigo visa apresentar os resultados obtidos a partir da pesquisa intervenção desenvolvida no âmbito do PROFLETRAS/UEFS. A pesquisa teveo objetivo de desenvolver ações didático-pedagógicas voltadas para a escrita colaborativa de infográficos digitais, aliando o uso das TDIC ao ensino-aprendizado em Língua Portuguesa, com vistas à ampliação das competências escritoras de estudantes do Tempo Formativo Juvenil 04, do turno noturno de uma escola da Rede Estadual do município de Feira de Santana, Bahia. Apesquisa intervençãodesenvolvidaencontra-se inserida no campo das pesquisas de natureza aplicada, onde desenvolvemos sequências didáticas voltadas para práticas de leitura e escrita de textos multimodais, a partir do gênero textual infográfico, com o apoio deuma plataforma online, intitulada Portal Cibernautas, e de um Caderno de Atividades, ambos criados pela professora-pesquisadora. Percebemos, a partir dos dados obtidosneste estudo, avanços na competência escritora, autonomia, colaboração, criatividade e criticidade dos sujeitos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".