MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979798305 · doi:10.1111/hdi.12792

Refractory orthostatic hypotension after creation of a brachio‐basilic arteriovenous fistula

2019· article· en· W2979798305 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Abuzeineh, Preethi Yerram, Madhukar Misra

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthostatic vital signsArteriovenous fistulaHemodialysisBasilic VeinSurgeryFistulaCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred vascular access in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, AVFs, can occasionally lead to clinically significant complications. Of these, cardiovascular complications have been well described in the literature. In this report, we describe a case of a 78-year-old Caucasian male with ESRD who presented with severe debilitating dizziness and orthostatic hypotension that started soon after the creation of left brachiobasilic AVF. The patient had no significant cardiovascular history apart from essential hypertension. His symptoms persisted despite extensive evaluation and interventions, and abated only after banding of the AVF. This report describes the timeline of the patient's clinical course beginning from the day of creation of his AVF, through the course of his hospitalization leading to AVF banding and ending with postoperative recovery phase with resolution of symptoms. We will also review the pathophysiologic effects of AVF on cardiovascular system, as well as the potential causes of our patient's clinical presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207