Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quais são as vias de intervenção privilegiadas e a promover em matéria de luta contra o assédio psicológico no trabalho ? A tendência actual das empresas é dotar-se de políticas e prever o recurso a serviços de mediação ou a procedimentos de inquérito. O artigo analisa primeiro as vantagens e limites destas formas de intervenção de natureza fortemente psicológica ou jurídica. A apresentação dos elementos organizacionais presentes nas várias situações de assédio permite seguidamente compreender que uma luta eficaz contra o assédio não pode reduzir-se a intervenções individuais feitas à margem dos lugares concretos do trabalho. As intervenções a promover devem contribuir para restabelecer as relações de solidariedade fragilizadas por formas de organização do trabalho e gestão que colocam as pessoas em situação constante de insegurança, de sobrecarga e de competição. Devem permitir a palavra e a acção colectivas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".