Molecular Biclonality: Analysis of Clonotypic IgH VDJ Reveals the Frequent Occurrence of a Second Clone in Multiple Myeloma.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 1813 Poster Board I-839 Malignant clones in multiple myeloma (MM) express unique clonotypic VDJ sequences associated with the clinical isotype. It has been widely assumed that MM patients have only one clone. However, our analysis reveals that a high frequency of MM patients have two clones. Analysis of complementary determining region 3 (CDR3) in bone marrow (BM) by DNA fragment analysis using florescent labeled consensus primers that bind to the framework region 3 and the joining region (FR3/JHc) or the framework region 3 and the constant region (FR3/CH1) related to the clinical isotype typically yields a single CDR3 peak, corresponding to the clonotypic VDJ gene segments. Signature sequences identified from CDR2 and CDR3 of clonotypic VDJ provides a molecular tool to monitor the malignant clone within a given patient. Study of CDR3 in BM and peripheral blood (PB) provides valuable information about the IgH VDJ repertoire and Ig expression profile, especially in cases where two clonal sequences are molecularly identified or when validation by single cell analysis did not show high frequency for a presumptive clonotypic IgH VDJ. Here, we analysed CDR3 expression profile in 23 MM patients. The results indicated a high incidence of MM having a second clone (6/23 patients, 26%). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of FR3/JHc and FR3/CH1 reveals a CDR3 peak representing the major MM clone in all 23 BM analysed. Among 23 patients, 6 (4 IgG, 2 IgA) exhibit a second monoclonal peak which can be detected both in PB and BM. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was unable to detect an increased incidence of IgH translocations within these 6 patients. Characterization of VDJ sequences indicated that the second clone mainly utilizes VH3 gene family (5/6), undergoes somatic hypermutation (5/6 at 2% cutoff) and does not derive from MM clone (6/6) as shown by different combinatorial and junctional diversity. Repertoire analysis determined by FR3/JHc amplification of genomic DNA excluded biallelic expression of the MM clone. In patient MM1, the second clone (μ) predominates in PB while the MM clone (γ) predominates in BM. In MM2, the second clone has a very short CDR3 (18 nt), predominates in blood compartment and has undergone isotype switching (μ, γ, á). In MM3, the M protein is of IgG type, consistent with transcripts in an FR3/Cγ RT-PCR peak in BM, but repertoire analysis of genomic DNA showed that the majority of B lineage cells in bone marrow and blood have a rearranged μ isotype. In MM4, having a homogeneous MM (á) clone, the second clone (á) exhibited intraclonal diversity, as defined by sequencing of VDJ subclones. In MM5, clonal transcripts of both dominant γ clone and the second clone (á) persisted in blood following initial chemotherapy. In MM6, the MM clone (γ) predominates over the second clone (á) both in BM and PB. Overall, our studies indicate a high incidence of biclonal expansion in MM. The unrelated VDJ origin of sister clones detected in MM patients exhibiting biclonality suggests that they may have arisen from different transformation event, which may be promoted when cumulative genetic abnormalities reach a critical threshold. Although clinical manifestations in a patient may reflect a take-over by the most aggressive clone, our studies suggest that transformation may be an ongoing event that occurs at a heretofore underestimated rate in MM B lineage cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".