MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979853567 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0726

Rectangular branch‐based load flow

2019· article· en· W2979853567 on OpenAlexafffund
Amr A. Mohamed, Bala Venkatesh

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power of constant impedance load is proportional to the square of bus voltage magnitude (SBVM). A solution space for a set of power balance equations (PBEs), constructed using SBVMs, has lower‐order terms and less non‐linearity. Such solution space yields faster solution. This work proposes a set of rectangular PBEs which uses SBVMs in conjunction with bus phase angles to relate branches power flow, a pair of real and reactive power equations for each branch for sending/receiving ends. Using an incidence matrix, branches power flows are related to bus powers with two set of equations for real and reactive powers. Another set of equations to relate rectangular form of voltages at generators to their voltage magnitudes, the total number of equations equals four times branches number, and two times buses number, less the two for unknown powers of slack bus. While the equations number is more than the node‐based PBEs, order of Jacobian's terms is significantly lower. Testing the proposed algorithm on numerous case studies, up to a 9241‐bus real system, showing the algorithm is precise, has superior convergence features, scales well for real systems and is up to thrice as fast as the rectangular node‐based load flow for some cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207