MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979897662 · doi:10.18280/i2m.180304

A Multi-sensor Data Fusion Method for Nondestructive Testing of Oil Pipelines

2019· article· en· W2979897662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guiqing Xi, Caojun Huang, Shiqi Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportNondestructive testingSensor fusionFusionComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringReliability engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper designs a multi-sensor data fusion method for the nondestructive testing system using both ultrasonic sensors and magnetic flux leakage (MFL) sensors.Firstly, the detected data were fused by fuzzy linear regression and Dempster-Shafer theory (DST).Next, the fused results were presented intuitively by computing the fuzzy upper and lower bounds of the damage size in a certain interval of reliability and confidence.The application in several cases shows that our method can represent any test data in a form closer to the actual damage size, and display the fused data in an intuitive manner.The research findings have great applicable potential in many industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207