Contribution of Coordinated Charging of Plug-in Electric Vehicles to Urban Medium Voltage Distribution Grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To facilitate the integration of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) into distribution networks, this paper proposes a coordinated charging approach. This approach consists of several stages. At first, a stochastic model of PEV charging demand is developed. Then, the constraints introduced into the power system are integrated into the mathematical model. Finally, optimal coordinated charging decisions are made through an improved optimization technique. The approach aims to minimize the total losses of the grid without violating system constraints and PEV owners' satisfaction. This strategy enables active and reactive power support to achieve peak load shaving and voltage regulation. The capability of the proposed coordinated charging approach of PEVs in mitigating the negative impacts of the recharging load is investigated on a typical power system by solving a mixed-integer linear programming problem. The study is carried out for different penetration levels of PEVs by modeling the stochastic temporal and spatial natures of the driving patterns. The proposed model considers charging at both residential and public charging stations. The findings of the study on a real distribution system using real local driving patterns and vehicle fleet data prove that not only the technical challenges of the high-penetrated PEVs to the grid is managed, but also the grid operation indices are improved significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".