MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979932195 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861760

V2V Communication-Assisted Transmit-Waveform Selection for Cognitive Vehicular Radars

2019· article· en· W2979932195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWaveformRadarKey (lock)Advanced driver assistance systemsSelection (genetic algorithm)CognitionRadar trackerReal-time computingTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular radar is one of the key components for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Through adaptive transmit-waveform selection, cognitive vehicular radar (CVR) can be developed to support advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). In this paper, we study the improvement of CVR tracking performance with the assistance of 5G vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications. The model of cognitive dynamic system (CDS) and its function of cognitive risk control (CRC) is incorporated in the design. Specifically, the perceptor of CVR has flexible filtering formulation, which will take the expanded form when V2V messages are available; on the other hand, the executive of CVR has flexible operational modes, which is expanded when unexpected risk needs to be brought under control. Simulation results have shown that the proposed method will improve tracking accuracy significantly in an uncertain and dynamic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207